Two strange flavoured Easter eggs to choose from...

Unusual flavourings for Easter eggs.

As it's Easter Sunday today, I thought I would feature a topical 'Would You Rather?' on the subject of Easter eggs.

Being a 'Would You Rather?' though, obviously it can't involve two normal Easter eggs, as that would be a bit pointless, so for the dilemma this month you've been given a choice of two non-conventional Easter eggs, and you have to eat one of them.

The first is a curry flavoured Easter egg and the second is a baked beans flavoured Easter egg.  Which one would you eat?

Baked Beans Curry Easter Eggs Food Would You Rather

09:01

Sleep or food to become non-essential.

A bed and a curry to illustrate the concepts of tiredness and hunger.

For this month's dilemma you get to choose between either sleep or food to become a non-essential part of life.  However, if you go for 'never get tired', you can still have a snooze if you want to, it's just that it wouldn't be physically necessary.  Taking a rest would be purely an optional choice.

And similarly, if you go for 'never get hungry' then of course you could still eat food, it's just that you wouldn't have to.  Eating would be purely for pleasurable purposes rather than for nutritional purposes.

Food Hungry Sleep Tired Would You Rather

09:01

... or that you could never enjoy the taste of nice food ever again?

Laughter or the taste of nice food?

If you go for the 'never taste nice food again' option, then you can still taste dangerous stuff, so you wouldn't have to worry about accidentally eating or drinking something which was poisonous, but you would no longer be able to experience all of the delicious tastes which you currently enjoy.  All the nice stuff which you like eating would from now on taste bland and tasteless.

If you go for the 'never laugh again' option then don't worry, you wouldn't suddenly become depressed or miserable.  You just wouldn't understand the concept of humour any longer.  You could still be happy and contented, but you wouldn't find things funny.  In fact you wouldn't find things even slightly amusing.

Both options would be a total gutter because obviously laughing and eating lush food are both brilliant things, but if you had to do without one or the other, then which one would you give up?  No more laughter or no more pleasant tastes?

Food Laughter Would You Rather

09:49

...or go without sleep for 48 hours?

Food or sleep?

Just to clarify, if you go for the 'go without food' option you're still allowed to drink water (as water isn't a food), but you can't have any drinks with calories or nutrients in them such as fizzy pop or soup, as that would be sort of cheating.

So those are the two options.  Go for forty eight hours without food or forty eight hours without sleep.  Which option would you go for?

Food Sleep Would You Rather

13:29